Users describe the repair list today as feeling like a minimal shopping cart: add lines, export, share. They want room to grow toward a deeper workspace over time—not urgent, but directionally important.
Examples of what teams have hinted at (discovery TBD):
- Status per item (e.g. proposed / agreed / withdrawn) or simple workflow for negotiation rounds.
- Notes or activity tied to the list or line items (who changed what, when) for office and agent handoff.
- Attachments or links on items (photos, contractor bids, emails) without leaving the flow.
- Side-by-side or linked view with the addendum builder so list ↔ addendum stay in sync.
- Compare or duplicate lists across revisions when the deal goes back and forth.
- Better handling of multiple lists on one job (buyer vs seller drafts, or versions over time).
Why it matters: Positions the repair experience for heavier negotiation and compliance use cases without forcing everything into email and spreadsheets.
Scope: Roadmap / discovery; no single MVP implied—break into smaller issues after research.
